🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an event that started out as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has adopted a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate gatherings where individuals of African heritage are compensated to speak with white audiences about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in winter, but also in October in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The period has transformed since that time, focusing less on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the method the month is observed is a reflection of the political moment. How it evolves is a valuable example in how co-option leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the summer we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels empowered to say that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, far-right parties are surging in the European continent as a entirety.

In the United States, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, often successfully, to the highest courts of the country. A effort to erase the history of people of color and narrative from the historical documents is in progress. One of the former president's initial presidential directives focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the celebration represents how minimally it can be influential if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is required. An academic expert, a educator at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month completely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an foundation that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed across all seasons (as some institutions are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not evade political issues, and leaves space for people, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the present reality of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who observe it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the threats that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and reactive. Maybe an complete renaming is required – Contemporary Black History Month.